Analysis correctness ≠ trading profit



Looking back at the recent Bitcoin decline, anyone can analyze it convincingly: expectations of interest rate cuts materialized, price structure reversed, MACD death cross, it sounds logically clear and flawless.

But when actually operating, one realizes that there are very few short-selling opportunities that meet the strategy. Once the limited entry points are missed, forcing a position means stepping outside the strategic framework, which is no longer called trading, but rather emotion-driven gambling.

To put it more bluntly, analysis only needs to focus on the results, while trading pays more attention to the process. The logic of analysis is self-consistent, but in real trading, it does not mean that a single order can be executed.

Why is it important to emphasize the difference between the two?

Because this explains why there is a phenomenon of "theoretical full marks, practical zero"…#LaunchpadXPL认购开启
BTC0.23%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 1
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Korfez41vip
· 09-26 12:15
let's go btc ethereum ath must be surpassed
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)