One of the biggest problems in Crypto is the dispersion of stablecoins across different chains.
The Alchemy Chain, which will be established with $ACH , will serve both as a fiat bridge and will gather stablecoins on a single network.
The vision of Alchemy Chain is to serve as both a fiat bridge and to merge stablecoins, which means it actually has competitors on two fronts at the same time.
Circle USDC: U.S. regulated, integrated with Visa and banks. But more focused on USDC, the multichain integration vision is limited.
Stellar XLM: Acting as a cross-border fiat–Crypto bridge for years. But more focused on low-volume remittances to developing countries.
Ripple XRP + XRPL Stablecoin: Strong fiat bridge towards banks.
The difference of ACH here: it directly touches individual users with global licenses. Circle & Ripple are more institutional.
Axelar AXL: It safely transfers stablecoins like USDC and USDT from chain to chain.
LayerZero ZRO: Similarly, it transfers stablecoins like USDC and USDT across different chains.
Wormhole W: It became a multi-chain stablecoin bridge, leaving the Solana ecosystem. It experienced a hack and there is a trust issue.
The difference of ACH here: They only create bridges between chains, but there is no fiat side. ACH, on the other hand, aims to combine both fiat entry and cross-chain transfers on the same network with Alchemy Chain.
Ondo Finance ONDO: Developing RWA-backed stablecoin bridges regulated by the US.
Celo CELO: Focused on mobile payments, it acts as a bridge by issuing its own stablecoins.
Here's the difference of ACH: Ondo is on the enterprise + RWA side, Celo is in developing countries. ACH, on the other hand, aims to build a global network that can reach everyone.
Fiat competitors on the bridge: Circle, Ripple, Stellar
Competitors in the cross-chain bridge: LayerZero, Wormhole, Axelar
RWA + stablecoin competitors on the bridge: Ondo, Celo
ACH advantage: Others are either just fiat bridges or just cross-chain bridges. Alchemy Chain aims to combine all of these into a single network.
Considering the market value of competitors, the rise that (AXL and CELO will make in the stablecoin hype wave may not be very satisfying.
I frequently share this information because ACH is very cheap in terms of price and market value compared to its competitors as a result of all the corporate steps it has taken, and I want you to see the vision I see.
Since AXL is already at a high level of institutionalization and its market value is at ideal buying levels compared to its potential, it has already been added to my basket.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
One of the biggest problems in Crypto is the dispersion of stablecoins across different chains.
The Alchemy Chain, which will be established with $ACH , will serve both as a fiat bridge and will gather stablecoins on a single network.
The vision of Alchemy Chain is to serve as both a fiat bridge and to merge stablecoins, which means it actually has competitors on two fronts at the same time.
Circle USDC: U.S. regulated, integrated with Visa and banks. But more focused on USDC, the multichain integration vision is limited.
Stellar XLM: Acting as a cross-border fiat–Crypto bridge for years. But more focused on low-volume remittances to developing countries.
Ripple XRP + XRPL Stablecoin:
Strong fiat bridge towards banks.
The difference of ACH here: it directly touches individual users with global licenses. Circle & Ripple are more institutional.
Axelar AXL: It safely transfers stablecoins like USDC and USDT from chain to chain.
LayerZero ZRO: Similarly, it transfers stablecoins like USDC and USDT across different chains.
Wormhole W: It became a multi-chain stablecoin bridge, leaving the Solana ecosystem. It experienced a hack and there is a trust issue.
The difference of ACH here: They only create bridges between chains, but there is no fiat side. ACH, on the other hand, aims to combine both fiat entry and cross-chain transfers on the same network with Alchemy Chain.
Ondo Finance ONDO: Developing RWA-backed stablecoin bridges regulated by the US.
Celo CELO: Focused on mobile payments, it acts as a bridge by issuing its own stablecoins.
Here's the difference of ACH: Ondo is on the enterprise + RWA side, Celo is in developing countries. ACH, on the other hand, aims to build a global network that can reach everyone.
Fiat competitors on the bridge:
Circle, Ripple, Stellar
Competitors in the cross-chain bridge:
LayerZero, Wormhole, Axelar
RWA + stablecoin competitors on the bridge:
Ondo, Celo
ACH advantage:
Others are either just fiat bridges or just cross-chain bridges.
Alchemy Chain aims to combine all of these into a single network.
Considering the market value of competitors, the rise that (AXL and CELO will make in the stablecoin hype wave may not be very satisfying.
I frequently share this information because ACH is very cheap in terms of price and market value compared to its competitors as a result of all the corporate steps it has taken, and I want you to see the vision I see.
Since AXL is already at a high level of institutionalization and its market value is at ideal buying levels compared to its potential, it has already been added to my basket.
)altcoin #crypto